When it comes to skin rejuvenation, there are several treatments available in the market. Two popular treatments are Procell Microchanneling and Microneedling. While both treatments are designed to stimulate collagen production, they differ in their approach and results. In this blog, we will compare and contrast Procell Microchanneling and Microneedling to help you decide which treatment is right for you.
What is Microneedling?
Microneedling is a minimally invasive procedure that involves using a handheld device with tiny needles to create micro-injuries on the skin. These micro-injuries stimulate the production of collagen and elastin, which can improve the overall texture, tone, and appearance of the skin. Microneedling is used to treat a variety of skin concerns such as fine lines, wrinkles, scars, hyperpigmentation, and uneven skin tone.
What is Procell Microchanneling?
Procell Microchanneling is a similar treatment to microneedling, but it uses a different approach. The Procell Microchanneling device creates microchannels in the skin using a stamping motion, rather than a rolling motion like a traditional microneedling device. The microchannels created by the Procell device are deeper and more precise than those created by traditional microneedling, allowing for more targeted treatment of specific skin concerns. Additionally, the Procell device infuses the skin with a custom serum that is tailored to the patient’s specific needs.
Procell Microchanneling vs. Microneedling: What's the Difference?
While both treatments are designed to stimulate collagen production, there are several differences between Procell Microchanneling and Microneedling.
Precision: Procell Microchanneling creates deeper and more precise microchannels than traditional microneedling. This allows for more targeted treatment of specific skin concerns.
Serum Infusion: Procell Microchanneling infuses the skin with a custom serum that is tailored to the patient’s specific needs. Microneedling does not include serum infusion.
Downtime: Procell Microchanneling has less downtime than traditional microneedling. Patients can typically resume normal activities within 24-48 hours after a Procell treatment, while microneedling may require up to 7 days of downtime.
Pain: Procell Microchanneling is less painful than traditional microneedling due to the stamping motion of the device.
Which Treatment is Right for You?
Both Procell Microchanneling and Microneedling can provide significant benefits for the skin, depending on your individual needs. If you are looking for a more precise and targeted treatment with a custom serum infusion, Procell Microchanneling may be the best option for you. On the other hand, if you are looking for a more traditional microneedling treatment with deeper penetration, then microneedling may be the best option for you.
In conclusion, Procell Microchanneling and Microneedling are both effective treatments for skin rejuvenation. Your choice between the two treatments will depend on your individual needs and preferences. We recommend consulting with a licensed skincare professional to determine which treatment is best for you.